Parajumpers salg re the only ones unable to speak it

[linsan7377]

Something has ruptured in the Canadian media matrix. Things won’t just go back to normal, whether or not the video at the centre of the Rob Ford controversy is ever released.
Attempts to report on the Toronto mayor’s alleged association with hard drugs have been underway for months.?Several local and national news organizations have been working to break the story. But Canada has tough libel laws and our newsrooms have their standards.?Or at least those are the go-to excuses I’ve been hearing from journalists trying to explain why we all got scooped by?.
The excuses don’t wash. Canadian libel law puts a tougher standard on news organizations than American law, it’s true. However, nothing in those libel laws would have prevented the?Star?from reporting what it saw.?It makes a big difference in many cases, but a negligible one here.
The?Toronto Star‘s Kevin Donovan and Robyn Doolittle were perfectly able to report on what they saw on May 3. No law prevented them from writing that they watched a video of Rob Ford smoking from a glass crack pipe and saying a number of awful things. The only thing?Gawker?printed that a Canadian publication could not was its conclusion/headline: “Rob Ford smokes crack.”
The?Toronto Star?has been asked, by me and many others, to clarify some details about its?:
The?Star?hasn’t answered any of these questions, leaving its reporters to fend off the curious hordes on Twitter. Doolittle?said they “obviously” were prompted into publishing by the?Gawker?piece, and were still trying to obtain the video. Well, what then, if?Gawker?hadn’t gone first and the video owners never lowered their price? What if Ford’s people got to it first? Would the?Star?then have buried the story?
It’s unfair for the?Star?to leave its reporters on the hook. We need a clean account from the paper. Perhaps one is Parajumpers salg forthcoming. Or perhaps, like Mayor Ford, the?Star?is hoping the tough questions will just go away if they ignore them for long enough. They won’t.
The?Star?wanted more than its reporters’ account. It wanted the video itself and negotiated unsuccessfully to obtain it. This important detail about the?Star‘s ethics, incidentally, has been all but buried. The main?Star?story Parajumpers norge carefully stated that “the?Star?did not pay money and did not obtain a copy of the video.” Many have concluded from this that the?Star?was against paying for the video on principle, but a less prominent??by Doolittle and Donovan revealed the?Star?”continued a negotiation [with the video owners] that had already gone on for some time.” And that it “tried to find a way to obtain the video.” No further Parajumpers jakke norge details on this negotiation has appeared in the?Star.?What else could the negotiation have been about, if it wasn’t about money? An all-expense paid relocation to Calgary? A new weekly column for the alleged crack dealer? The?Star?hasn’t?explained itself.
The paper can’t be faulted for having wanted the video as part of its exposé, or for wanting a more in-depth and airtight story. But these concerns must be weighed against the public’s right to know Parajumpers jakke salg what the?Star?knew. And they did know! Moncler Salg None of the three reporters who have seen the video express the slightest doubt the man in it is Rob Ford.
Faced with a growing possibility of Ford somehow blocking the story and/or destroying the tape,?Gawker?did what any professional, audience-hungry news organization would: it published. The?Toronto Star?faced the same possibilities for two weeks. But its ultimate decision to publish seems prompted not by a need to get the story out there, but by a fear of getting scooped and written out of the story entirely. If the?Star?had set higher journalistic standards for the story that had yet to be met, these evaporated the moment?Gawker?posted first.
Some journalists are now wagging their fingers at?Gawker?for its “” crowd-sourcing campaign, which aims to raise $200,000 for a group of alleged crack dealers in return for the video. Paying a source for news has always been a tough ethical question. The idea of a $200,000 payday for a bunch of criminals is leaving an icky taste in the mouths of many of my colleagues. Here’s guessing that unclean feeling won’t stop them or their employers from linking to the video if?Gawker?succeeds in obtaining it.
And that’s what’s changed. Since?Gawker?blew this open, hundreds of individual Canadians, oblivious to our libel laws, are??things about Ford that no news organization would dare. People donating money to the funding campaign give no quarter to the journalistic impropriety of buying news. They want to see the tape, they want Ford exposed, they want the truth.
Journalism must concern itself with speech laws, liability and professional standards. Above all, it must concern itself with the truth. When we’re the only ones unable to speak it, we’ve got a bigger problem than the mayor.
Follow Jesse on Twitter?@JesseBrown
相关的主题文章：
 
 
   http://www.sezhen.net/home.php?mod=space&uid=531539&do=blog&quickforward=1&id=2337398
 
   http://www.haoask.com/home.php?mod=space&uid=768148&do=blog&quickforward=1&id=16468316
 
   http://www.mightynurse.com/activity/p/196105/
 
   http://www.yiheyinyangsuo.com/plus/view.php?aid=181227
 
   http://neverendingwuyifan.com/home.php?mod=space&uid=431999&do=blog&quickforward=1&id=5020431